← Back to orders

LR25-39

IRAC · September 3, 2025 · dismissed · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
September 3, 2025
Panel / officer
Pamela J. Williams
Applicant
tenant
Landlord
Paula DesRoches
Tenant
Keyena Smith and Adam Roberts
Outcome
dismissed
Issues
eviction, abandonment
RTA sections
60(1), 54, 7, 28(3), 89(9)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Tenant appeal · eviction, abandonment. Outcome: dismissed.

Linked prior order: LD25-290

Order text

Date Issued: September 3, 2025 Dockets: LR25044 Type: Rental Appeal
INDEXED AS: Keyena Smith and Adam Roberts v. Paula DesRoches
2025 PEIRAC 42 (CanLII)
Order No: LR25-39
BETWEEN:
Keyena Smith and Adam Roberts (the “Tenants”) Appellants
AND:
Paula DesRoches (the “Landlord”) Respondent
ORDER
Panel Members: Pamela J. Williams, K.C., Chair
Kerri Carpenter, Vice Chair

2
A. INTRODUCTION
1. This appeal was heard by the Commission on September 2, 2025, and asks the
Commission to determine whether the Residential Tenancy Office (the “Rental Office”) erred in finding that the tenancy between the parties will terminate effective 5:00 pm on August 18, 2025.
B. BACKGROUND
2. This appeal concerns a rental unit located at 99 Autumn Street, Summerside, PEI (the “Rental Unit”). The Rental Unit is a one-bedroom, one-bathroom rental unit that the Landlord has owned for 13 or 14 years. The Landlord’s spouse also owns the Unit.
3. The Landlord and the Tenants entered into a written, month-to-month tenancy agreement (the “Tenancy Agreement”) that started on May 26, 2025. Rent of $1,350.00 was due each month. A security deposit of $500.00 was required but not paid.
4. On July 1, 2025 the Landlord served the Tenants with a Form 4(A) Eviction Notice with an effective date of July 20, 2025 (the “Notice”) for non-payment of rent and the security deposit.
5. The Rental Office noted that the correct vacate date for non-payment of rent was July 21, 2025 under subsection 60(1) of the Act. This date is automatically corrected under section
54.
6. On July 3, 2025 the Tenants filed a Form 2(A) Tenant Application to Determine Dispute with the Rental Office disputing the Notice and making other claims.
7. On July 24, 2025 the Rental Office sent the parties notice of a teleconference hearing scheduled for August 7, 2025.
8. On July 24, 2025 the Tenants amended their application.
9. On July 28, 2025 the Landlord filed a Form 2(B) Landlord Application to Determine Dispute with the Rental Office (the “Landlord Application”) requesting the Tenants to vacate the Unit and for Sheriff Services to put the Landlord in possession. Those matters were determined by the Rental Office in Order LD25-290. The Landlord Application also seeks rent owing; that matter was determined by the Rental Office in Order LD25-291.
10. On July 29, 2025 the Rental Office sent the parties an updated notice of a teleconference hearing.
11. On July 31, 2025 the Tenants amended their application a final time (the “Tenant Application”). The Tenants’ claim disputing the Notice was determined by the Rental Office in Order LD25-290. The Tenants’ other claims were determined by the Rental Office in
Order LD25-291.

3
12. On August 7, 2025 one of the Tenants, the Landlord and the Landlord’s representative participated in a teleconference hearing before the Rental Office for determination of the Tenant Application and the Landlord Application.
13. On August 11, 2025, the Rental Office issued Order LD25-290, which ordered that the tenancy between the parties will terminate effective 5:00 pm on August 18, 2025. The Rental office also issued Order LD25-291, which ordered the Tenants to pay the Landlord rent owing in the amount of $2,351.61, which must be paid by September 11, 2025.
14. The Tenants appealed both Order LD25-290 and Order LD25-291 to the Commission by filing a Notice of Appeal on August 18, 2025.
15. The Commission heard the appeal on September 2, 2025, by way of telephone
conference. The Landlord, Paula DesRoches, and the Landlord representative, Laura Chaisson attended the telephone hearing. The Tenants did not participate in the hearing.
16. The applicable legislation is the Residential Tenancy Act, cap. R-13.11 (the “Act”).
C. DISPOSITION
17. The appeal is deemed abandoned. Orders LD25-290 and LD25-291 remain in effect.
D. NOTIFICATION OF THE TENANTS
18. Commission staff made the following attempts to contact the Tenants using the email address and telephone number provided on their Notice of Appeal form:
• August 18, 2025 – Receipt of the Notice of Appeal was acknowledged by email.
• August 19, 2025 – An email containing a letter, Notice of Hearing with the date and time of the hearing, proposed exhibit list, exhibits and instruction on using the zoom platform.
• August 28, 2025 – An email containing the final exhibit list (also contains date and time of hearing), exhibits and zoom instructions.
• September 2, 2025 – After the Tenants failed to connect to the hearing, the August 28, 2025 email was re-sent and the Tenants were requested to dial in to the hearing.
• September 2, 2025 – Telephone calls made at 9:01, 9:05 and 9:08 a.m. The Tenants did not answer the telephone.
E. STATEMENT FROM THE LANDLORD
19. Laura Chaisson stated that the Tenants are still residing in the Rental Unit. She stated that the Tenants have not paid any money towards rent since May 26, 2025.

4
F. APPEAL ABANDONED
20. The Commission is satisfied that notice of the date, time and participation instructions were provided to the Tenants. The Tenants failed to participate in the hearing of their appeal. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 29 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, this appeal is deemed abandoned.
G. CONCLUSION
21. The appeal is deemed abandoned as the Tenants failed to participate in their own appeal hearing. Accordingly, Orders LD25-290 and LD25-291 remain in full force and effect. The tenancy agreement is terminated effective Friday September 5, 2025 at 5:00 p.m.
22. The Tenants are reminded that when they vacate the Rental Unit, they are to be mindful of their obligations pursuant to subsections 28(3), (4) and (5) of the Residential Tenancy Act with respect to ordinary cleanliness and the repair of undue damage.
23. The Tenants are also reminded that they owe rent up to and including the date they vacate the Rental Unit.

5
IT IS ORDERED THAT
1. The appeal is deemed abandoned.
2. Orders LD25-290 and LD25-291 remain in full force and effect.
3. The tenancy agreement between the parties is terminated effective Friday
September 5, 2025 at 5:00 p.m.
4. The Tenants and all occupants shall vacate the Rental Unit and remove all
personal property by Friday September 5, 2025 at 5:00 p.m.
5. The Tenants owe rent up to and including the date they vacate the Rental Unit.
6. A certified copy of this Order may be filed in the Supreme Court and enforced by Sheriff Services as permitted by the Residential Tenancy Act.
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, 3rd day of September, 2025.
BY THE COMMISSION:
(sgd.) Pamela J. Williams Pamela J. Williams, K.C., Chair
(sgd.) Kerri Carpenter Kerri Carpenter, Vice Chair

6
NOTICE
Subsections 89 (9), (10) and (11) of the Residential Tenancy Act provides as follows:
89. (9) A landlord or tenant may, within 15 days of the
decision of the Commission, appeal to the Court of Appeal in accordance with the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act R.S.P.E.I. 1988, Cap. I-11, on a question of law only.
(10) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director, the landlord or tenant may file the order with the Supreme Court.
(11) Where an order is filed under subsection (10), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the Supreme Court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LD26-286granted · rto

    Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the Landlords may dispose of the Personal Property listen on the Inventory on or after August 14, 2026.

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…

  • LD26-279granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-275granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …

  • LD26-274granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.