Quick summary
Auto-indexedAppeal · eviction. Outcome: denied. The appeal is denied and Director’s Order LD21-404 is confirmed. The Issue Did the Director correctly determine that the Form 4 dated October 6, 2021 was valid?
Linked prior order: LD21-404
Order text
Docket LR21052 – Lisa Hughes and Scott Ryan v. Empire Developments Inc. Tuesday, November 9, 2021 Docket: LR21052 Order: LR21-48 BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Tuesday, November 9, 2021. Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair Hearing Date: Monday, November 8, 2021 ORDER IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Lisa Hughes and Scott Ryan against Order LD21-404 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property dated October 27, 2021. Compared and Certified a True Copy (Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR21-48 Page 2 Docket LR21052 – Lisa Hughes and Scott Ryan v. Empire Developments Inc. Tuesday, November 9, 2021 This appeal asks the Commission to determine whether the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) erred in finding that an eviction notice was valid. BACKGROUND Lisa Hughes (“Ms. Hughes”) and Scott Ryan (“Mr. Ryan”) rent premises located at 20 Lower Malpeque Road, Unit 189, Charlottetown, PE (the “Premises”), from Empire Developments Inc. (the “Landlord”). On October 6, 2021, a representative of the Landlord served a Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (“Form 4”) on Ms. Hughes and Mr. Ryan citing breaches of clauses 14(1)(a) and 14(1)(b) of the Act. The Director found that the effective date of the Form 4 was November 6, 2021. On October 12, 2021, Ms. Hughes filed with the Director an Application by Lessee to Set Aside Notice of Termination (“Form 6”). In Order LD21-404 dated October 27, 2021, the Director ordered that the Form 4 was valid, the Form 6 was dismissed, and that Ms. Hughes and Mr. Ryan vacate the Premises by 4:00 p.m. on November 6, 2021. Ms. Hughes appealed. The Commission heard the appeal on November 8, 2021, by telephone conference call. Ms. Hughes was present on the conference call and represented herself and Mr. Ryan. Tami MacIntyre and Stephen MacDougall represented the Landlord and were also present on the conference call. Disposition The appeal is denied and Director’s Order LD21-404 is confirmed. The Issue Did the Director correctly determine that the Form 4 dated October 6, 2021 was valid? Analysis The Commission has reviewed and applied the applicable legislation and finds that the Director was correct in granting the Landlord’s application. The evidence establishes clear breaches of the Act, and there no new or contradictory evidence before the Commission which would warrant disturbing the findings of the Director in Order LD21-404. Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR21-48 Page 3 Docket LR21052 – Lisa Hughes and Scott Ryan v. Empire Developments Inc. Tuesday, November 9, 2021 NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is denied. 2. Director’s Order LD21-404 is confirmed. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Tuesday, November 9, 2021. BY THE COMMISSION: (sgd. Erin T. Mitchell) Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner (sgd. M. Douglas Clow) M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair NOTICE Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows: 26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.
Similar cases
Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.
- LD26-293granted · rto
Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.
- LD26-289granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…
- LR26-38dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…
- LD26-281dismissed · rto
Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…
- LD26-279granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.
- LD26-275granted · rto
Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …
- LD26-274granted · rto
Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.
- LD26-268granted · rto
Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.