Quick summary
Auto-indexedApplication · other. Outcome: outcome pending review. The Landlord may have the Tenant’s two vehicles professionally towed after the timeline below.
Linked prior order: LD25-353
Order text
Order of The Director of Residential Tenancy Docket 25-710 September 24, 2025 INTRODUCTION [1] This decision determines an application filed with the Residential Tenancy Office (“Rental Office”) under the Residential Tenancy Act (“Act”). [2] The Landlord requests an order permitting the removal of two vehicles from the Residential Property. DISPOSITION [3] The Landlord may have the Tenant’s two vehicles professionally towed after the timeline below. BACKGROUND [4] The Unit is an apartment in a building (“Residential Property”). [5] On May 1, 2023, the parties entered into an oral, monthly tenancy agreement for the Unit. The Tenant paid a $500.00 security deposit. Rent in the amount of $900.00 is due on the first day of the month. [6] On August 13, 2025, the Landlord’s representative (“Representative”) served the Tenant with a Form 4(A) Eviction Notice with an effective date of September 2, 2025 (“Notice”) for non-payment of rent, in the amount of $1,000.00. [7] On August 21, 2025, the Representative filed a first Form 2(B) Landlord Application to Determine Dispute (“First Application”) with the Rental Office requesting an order to remove two vehicles from the Residential Property, which is determined in this decision. [8] On September 4, 2025, the Representative filed a second Form 2(B) Landlord Application to Determine Dispute (“Second Application”) with the Rental Office seeking vacant possession of the Unit and for Sheriff Services to put the Landlord in possession, which is determined in Order LD25-353. [9] Collectively, the First Application and the Second Application are referred to as the “Applications”. [10] On September 12, 2025, the Rental Office provided the parties notice of a teleconference hearing scheduled for September 23, 2025, along with copies of the Applications. [11] On September 19, 2025, the Rental Office emailed the parties a 16-page evidence package. [12] On September 23, 2025, the Representative joined the teleconference hearing for determination of the Applications. I telephoned and emailed the Tenant the teleconference details, along with a copy of the evidence package. The hearing proceeded ten minutes after the scheduled time without the Tenant. The Representative confirmed that all evidence submitted to the Rental Office was included. ISSUE A. Can the Landlord remove the Tenant’s two vehicles from the Residential Property? ANALYSIS [13] In Order LD25-353, I have found that the tenancy will end at 5:00 p.m. on October 1, 2025. [14] The Landlord’s evidence establishes that the Tenant has two vehicles: A Dodge Caravan and a GTI Volkswagen, which have flat tires. The vehicles have not been registered or inspected since 2023. [15] The Representative stated that he has requested that the Tenant remove the two vehicles many times. The Representative stated that the Tenant has told him in August 2025 that he would remove the vehicles “within a week.” The Representative stated that the Tenant has not removed the vehicles as of the date of the hearing. [16] Subsections 43(1) and (2) of the Act state: A tenant is not entitled to leave the tenant’s personal property in the rental unit after the tenancy agreement is terminated. Where a tenant abandons or vacates a rental unit and leaves personal property on the residential property, the landlord shall either (a) remove the personal property and immediately place it in safe storage; or (b) store the personal property on the residential property in a safe manner. [17] Clause 85(1)(p) of the Act states: After hearing an application, the Director may make an order (p) Imposing terms and conditions the Director considers appropriate, including terms and conditions to ensure compliance with this Act, the regulations and the tenancy agreement. [18] I find that the evidence establishes that the Tenant still has possession of the Unit. As the Tenant still has possession of the Unit, I cannot conclude that the Tenant has abandoned or vacated the Unit. [19] As a result, I find that the two vehicles are not considered abandoned personal property under subsection 43(2) of the Act. [20] I find it is appropriate in this case to approve the First Application to ensure that the Tenant complies with subsection 43(1) of the Act. [21] The Tenant must remove the two vehicles from the Residential Property by the timeline below. [22] If the Tenant does not remove the two vehicles from the Residential Property by the timeline below, then the Landlord may have a professional towing company remove the two vehicles from the Residential Property after the timeline below. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 1. The Tenant must remove the two vehicles from the Residential Property by 5:00 p.m. on October 1, 2025. 2. The Landlord may have a professional towing company remove the two vehicles from the Residential Property after 5:00 p.m. on October 1, 2025. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 24th day of September, 2025. (sgd.) Cody Burke Cody Burke Residential Tenancy Officer NOTICE Right to Appeal This Order can be appealed to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (the “Commission”) by serving a Notice of Appeal with the Commission and every party to this Order within 20 days of this Order. If a document is sent electronically after 5:00 p.m., it is considered received the next day that is not a holiday. If a document is sent by mail, it is considered served on the third day after mailing.
Similar cases
Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.
- LD26-296granted · rto
Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.
- LD26-294granted · rto
Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…
- LR26-37granted · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…
- LR26-36dismissed · irac
Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…
- LR26-35dismissed · irac
Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…
- LD26-238granted · rto
Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…
- LR26-34dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…
- LR26-33dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…