Quick summary
Auto-indexedTenant appeal · other. Outcome: denied.
Linked prior order: LD17-126
Order text
Order LR17-07 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR17009 - Kelsey Smith v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR17009 Order LR17-07 IN THE MATTER of an appeal filed under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act by Kelsey Smith against Order LD17-126 dated May 12, 2017 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Tuesday, the 20th day of June, 2017. John Broderick, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner Order BACKGROUND On June 1, 2017 the Commission received a Notice of Appeal from a lessee, Kelsey Smith (the "Appellant"), requesting an appeal of Order LD17-126 dated May 12, 2017 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property (the "Director"). By way of background, on January 4, 2017 the Appellant filed with the Director a Form 2 - Application for Enforcement of Statutory or Other Conditions of Rental Agreement seeking a finding that rent is owed; an order that an amount found to be owed be paid; and determination of proper rent rate. The matter was heard by the Director on April 20, 2017 and in Order LD17-126 the Director ordered: "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 1. The lessee's application for return of rent is not approved. 2. The rent for the resident premises located at 75 Cumberland Street, Apartment 3 shall remain at $650.00 per month until it is raised in accordance with the Rental of Residential Property Act ." The Commission heard the appeal on June 19, 2017. The Appellant was present. The lessor, Cecil Campbell (the "Respondent") was also present. EVIDENCE The Appellant filed a written submission and photographs in support of her appeal. She testified that the apartment contains two rooms plus a bathroom and thus was a one-bedroom apartment both before and after the appeal. She submitted that before the renovations a tenant could have placed living room furniture such as a couch in the kitchen, but instead decided to place such furniture in the bedroom. The Appellant submits that renovations alone do not automatically justify an increase in rent. The Appellant requests that the monthly rent be returned to the initial amount of $500.00 paid by the previous tenant. The Appellant also requests a return of nine months excess rent totalling $1350.00. The Respondent testified that the renovations took two months to complete, with the kitchen moved to a different room. He noted that a door was placed between the two rooms to make them accessible to each other without the need to go out into the hallway. He also noted that there was considerable plumbing and electrical work done as well as repainting. The Respondent requests that Director's Order LD17-126 be upheld by the Commission. DECISION The appeal is denied and Director's Order LD17-126 is upheld for the reasons that follow. The Commission agrees with the Director that, contrary to industry belief, renovations to a unit do not automatically allow a lessor to raise rent between tenants. The Commission also agrees with the findings of the Director that the renovations and changes in layout were sufficient to meet the threshold of defining the unit as a new apartment, and in such case the lessor is free to set the rent on such new unit. Accordingly, the rent shall remain at $650.00 per month. Any increase in this rent would require compliance with the Rental of Residential Property Act including the notice requirements specifically set out in section 22 of said Act . NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act ; IT IS ORDERED THAT The a ppeal is denied. Director's Order LD17-126 is hereby confirmed. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 20th day of June, 2017 . BY THE COMMISSION : John Broderick Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commisisoner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.
Similar cases
Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.
- LD26-296granted · rto
Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.
- LD26-294granted · rto
Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…
- LR26-37granted · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…
- LR26-36dismissed · irac
Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…
- LR26-35dismissed · irac
Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…
- LD26-238granted · rto
Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…
- LR26-34dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…
- LR26-33dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…