← Back to orders

LR09-17

IRAC · September 15, 2009 · unknown · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
September 15, 2009
Panel / officer
Maurice Rodgerson
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Appeal · other. Outcome: outcome pending review.

Linked prior order: LD09-249

Order text

Order LR09-17 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR09021 - Brenda LaBobe v. Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR09021 Order LR09-17 IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act , by Brenda LaBobe against Order No. LD09-249, of the Director of Residential Rental Property, dated August 18, 2009. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Tuesday, the 15th day of September, 2009. Maurice Rodgerson, Chair Ernest Arsenault, Commissioner David Holmes, Commissioner Order On August 25, 2009, the Commission received a Notice of Appeal filed by the Appellant Brenda LaBobe (Ms. LaBobe). Ms. LaBobe appealed Order No. LD09-249 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property (the Director) on August 18, 2009. On August 26, 2009, Commission staff mailed a Notice of Appeal Hearing to Ms. LaBobe at the address noted on her Notice of Appeal. A Notice of Appeal Hearing was also mailed to the Respondent Nanegkam Housing Corporation (Nanegkam). The Notice of Appeal Hearing stated in part: TAKE NOTICE that a hearing into the attached appeal will be held by The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission on Wednesday September 9, 2009 at the National Bank Tower, 5th Floor, 134 Kent Street, Charlottetown, P.E.I., at 1:30 p.m. At 1:30 p.m. on September 9, 2009 Ms. LaBobe was not present in the hearing room. Commission staff attempted to call Ms. LaBobe without success. Commission staff checked with the Commission's receptionist to see if any messages had been received from Ms. LaBobe. No telephone or email messages were received. The Commission commenced the hearing at 1:35 p.m. The hearing concluded at 1:40 p.m. with Ms. LaBobe still not present. The Commission finds that the onus lies on an appellant to pursue an appeal. Ms. LaBobe was informed of the date, time and location of the appeal hearing. Ms. LaBobe did not request a postponement for just cause, she did not file a letter or written submissions putting forward her position, she did not request to participate in the hearing by telephone and she did not ask that her appeal hearing proceed in her absence. Ms. LaBobe, by filing an appeal, brought the Director's decision before the Commission. At the brief hearing, the Commission heard from Marla Affleck, Nanegkam's representative, that Ms. LaBobe has not, to date, paid rent for the month of September 2009. Ms. Affleck told the Commission that Ms. LaBobe is currently in arrears of rent in the amount of $3,482.00. For the above reasons, the Commission finds that Ms. LaBobe abandoned her appeal, and accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed. Accordingly, Order No. LD09-249 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property on August 18, 2009 remains in full force and effect. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act : IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is hereby dismissed. 2. Order LD09-249 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property on August 18, 2009 remains in full force and effect. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 15th day of September, 2009. BY THE COMMISSION : Maurice Rodgerson, Chair Ernest Arsenault, Commissioner David Holmes, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-296granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.

  • LD26-294granted · rto

    Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…

  • LR26-37granted · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…

  • LR26-36dismissed · irac

    Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…

  • LR26-35dismissed · irac

    Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…

  • LD26-238granted · rto

    Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…

  • LR26-34dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…

  • LR26-33dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…