← Back to orders

LR18-40

IRAC · October 26, 2018 · granted · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
October 26, 2018
Panel / officer
M. Douglas Clow
Applicant
landlord
Landlord
Tim James Holdings Ltd
Outcome
granted
Issues
eviction
RTA sections
25, 26(2)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Landlord appeal · eviction. Outcome: granted.

Linked prior order: LD18-293

Order text

Order LR18-40 - Rental Appeal - Docket LR18039 - Tim James Holdings Ltd. v Director of Residential Rental Property Docket LR18039 Order LR18-40 IN THE MATTER of an appeal filed under Section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act by Tim James Holdings Ltd. against Order LD18-293 dated September 12, 2018 issued by the Office of the Director of Residential Rental Property. BEFORE THE COMMISSION on Friday, the 26th day of October, 2018. M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair John Broderick, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner Order BACKGROUND On September 28, 2018 the Commission received a Notice of Appeal from a lessor, Tim James Holdings Ltd. (the "Appellant"), requesting an appeal of Order LD18-293 dated September 12, 2018 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property (the "Director"). By way of background, on August 21, 2018, two lessees, Mark Driscoll and Alanna Manning (the "Respondents") filed with the Director a Form 6 - Application by Lessee to Set Aside Notice of Termination. Attached to the Form 6 was a Form 4 - Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement dated August 16, 2018 to be effective October 30, 2018 signed by the Appellant. The matter was heard by the Director on September 11, 2018 and in Order LD18-309 the Director ordered: "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT 1. The lessees' application to Set Aside the Notice of Termination by Lessor of Rental Agreement (Form 6) dated August 21, 2018 is allowed, and the rental agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect." The Commission heard the appeal on October 25, 2018. The Appellant was represented by Tim James ("Mr. James") who appeared by way of telephone conference call. The Respondents did not appear at the hearing. EVIDENCE Mr. James testified as to the nature of the renovations required to the residential unit. He testified there are moisture problems in the building's basement and concerns about the development of mold. The remedy is to install polyethylene barrier over the clay basement floor and then pour a concrete floor in the basement. The distance between the Appellant's building and the adjacent building is insufficient for a concrete truck to go in the lane. Accordingly, holes will need to be cut through the floor of the residential unit and concrete pumped through the holes. Given the disruption to the residential unit, Mr. James also plans substantial renovations. Mr. James requests that the rental agreement be terminated to allow the work to commence. DECISION The appeal is allowed for the reasons that follow. The Commission notes that a Notice of Appeal hearing was mailed to the Respondents at their last known mailing address on October 5, 2018. When the Respondents failed to appear at the scheduled time, Commission staff attempted to call the Respondents to remind them of the hearing. The Commission waited an additional 20 minutes before commencing the hearing. Accordingly, the Commission is satisfied that the Respondents received notification of the date and time of the appeal hearing. Having heard the unrefuted testimony of Mr. James and having reviewed the additional documentation provided with the Appellant's appeal, the Commission is satisfied that the work to address the moisture issue is required and this work, along with other renovations, can commence. The Commission is also satisfied that the Appellant and Mr. James are acting in good faith. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, and the rental agreement between the Appellant and the Respondents is hereby terminated as of 11:59 p.m. Wednesday October 31, 2018. NOW THEREFORE , pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is allowed. 2. The rental agreement between the Appellant lessor and the Respondent lessees is terminated effective 11:59 p.m. Wednesday October 31, 2018. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 26th day of October , 2018 . BY THE COMMISSION : M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair John Broderick, Commissioner Jean Tingley, Commissioner NOTICE Sections 26.(2), 26.(3), 26.(4) and 26.(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provide as follows: 26.(2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court. NOTICE: IRAC File Retention In accordance with the Commission's Records Retention and Disposition Schedule, the material contained in the official file regarding this matter will be retained by the Commission for a period of 2 years.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LD26-293granted · rto

    Application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant may continue living in the Unit.

  • LD26-289granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is valid and the Application is allowed. [12] The Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit and return the Unit’s keys to…

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-281dismissed · rto

    Application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The Application is dismissed because the Rental Office does not have jurisdiction to determine the dispute between the Applicant and the Re…

  • LD26-279granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, rent arrears. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenants and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-275granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. I find that the Notice is invalid and the Application is allowed. The tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living …

  • LD26-274granted · rto

    Landlord application · eviction, disturbance. Outcome: granted. The Notice is valid and the Tenant and all occupants must vacate the Unit by the timeline below.

  • LD26-268granted · rto

    Application · eviction, disturbance, illegal activity. Outcome: granted. The tenancy will continue in full force and effect.