← Back to orders

LD24-025

RTO · January 24, 2024 · granted · Auto-indexed

Open saved PDFOriginal source ↗
Decision date
January 24, 2024
Rental officer
Mitchell King
Applicant
landlord
Outcome
granted
Issues
rent increase
RTA sections
50(1), 49(2), 100(1), 75, 50(3), 4, 75(3)

Quick summary

Auto-indexed

Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted.

Order text

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy
Docket 23-906 January 24, 2024
Introduction
[1] On November 9, 2023 the Landlord submitted 9 Landlord Application to Request Additional Rent Increase (Form 9s) (the “Applications”) with the Residential Tenancy Office (the “Rental Office”), pursuant to subsection 50(1) of the Residential Tenancy Act (the “Act”).
[2] The Applications seek a rent increase above the annual allowable guidelines established by the Director of Residential Tenancy (the “Director”), pursuant to subsection 49(2) of the Act. The Applications disclose the current rents, proposed rents and the effective dates as listed:
Unit Current Rent Proposed Rent Effective Date 55 $1,247.00 $1,322.00 January 1, 2024 57 $1,247.00 $1,322.00 January 1, 2024 59 $1,247.00 $1,322.00 January 1, 2024 61 $1,247.00 $1,322.00 January 1, 2024 63 $1,247.00 $1,322.00 January 1, 2024 65 $1,247.00 $1,322.00 January 1, 2024 67 $1,247.00 $1,322.00 January 1, 2024 69 $1,389.00 $1,472.00 January 1, 2024 71 $1,247.00 $1,322.00 January 1, 2024
[3] On November 9, 2023 the Landlord submitted into evidence the Landlord Statement of Income and Expenses (Form 10) (the “Statement”).
[4] All documents (including the Tenant Notice of Annual Allowable Rent Increases (Form 8), the
Notice of Hearing and Evidence Package) were properly served to the parties in accordance with subsection 100(1) of the Act.
[5] On January 15, 2024, a teleconference hearing was held before a Residential Tenancy Officer (the “Officer”). The Representatives appeared, representing the Landlord. Tenants from 6 units appeared, representing themselves.
Issue to be Decided
i. Is the Landlord entitled to an additional rent increase above the annual guidelines?
Summary of the Evidence
[6] The Landlord submitted 53-pages of documents into evidence to support the Applications and the Statement.
Landlord’s Evidence and Submissions
[7] The Representatives testified that expenses for the Residential Property have been increasing and rents have not increased to keep up with the rise in expenses. The Representatives acknowledged the Tenants’ maintenance requests and stated further research would be conducted into the matters.
Tenants’ Evidence and Submissions
[8] All six Tenants who participated in the hearing provided either written or oral submissions stating they were opposed to the rent increase. The Tenants stated there are maintenance issues at the Residential Property which are required to be addressed. Some of the Tenants cited financial hardship as a reason they are opposed to the rent increase.

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

Adjustments to the Statement
[9] The Officer’s adjustments to the Statement are provided below and are reflected in the Appendix “A” of this Order.
1. [Line 1 – Rental income]
The Landlord disclosed the rental income for the Residential Property on the Statement as $136,380.00. The additional rent increase would increase the rental income to $144,563.00.
2. [Value of investment in the property]
The value of the investment in the property is $1,210,553.00 which represents the 2013 purchase price plus capital expenses.
Analysis
[10] The Applications are made in accordance with section 75 of the Act and is pursuant to subsection 50(1). When deliberating on the Applications, the Officer must consider the factors outlined in subsections 50(3) and (4) of the Act and section 4 of the Residential Tenancy Regulations (the “Regulations”). The prescribed law is as follows:
Factors (3) The Director shall consider the following factors, as applicable, in deciding whether to approve an application for a rent increase under subsection (1):
(a) the rent history for the affected rental unit in the three years preceding the date of the application;
(b) a change in operating expenses and capital expenditures in the three years preceding the date of the application that the Director considers relevant and reasonable;
(c) the expectation of the landlord to have a reasonable return on the landlord’s capital investment;
(d) the expectation of the tenant that rent increases will remain within the annual guideline.
Other factors (4) The Director may also consider (a) any other factor considered relevant by the Director; and (b) any other factor prescribed in the regulations.
Request for additional increase
4. For the purposes of clause 50(4)(b) of the Act, the Director may also consider that the purchase of a residential property should not require an increase of rent within the first year in order to achieve a reasonable return on the landlord’s capital investment. (EC269/23)
[11] The Applications require the Landlord to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that they are entitled to an additional rent increase above the annual allowable guidelines. This means that the Landlord must provide the decision-maker with sufficiently clear and convincing evidence to establish their request.

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

Factors
[12] Regarding clause 50(3)(a), the Landlord provided the rents for the Residential Property over the past three years.
[13] Regarding clause 50(3)(b), the Landlord provided numerous documents into evidence including:
invoices, receipts and summary financial statements to assist in establishing a change in operating expenses over the past three years.
[14] Regarding clause 50(3)(c), the Statement’s income and expenses disclose that the Landlord currently yields a 1.4% return on investment. After the adjustments to the Statement (found in Appendix “A”), and the inclusion of the annual allowable and the additional rent increase, the return on investment would yield a 2.1% return.
[15] Regarding clause 50(3)(d), the evidence establishes that the last additional rent increases were in August 2022.
[16] The Residential Property was not purchased in the past 12 months. The Residential Property does not fit into the Regulations additional factor for consideration.
[17] The Officer concludes that the Landlord is entitled to an additional rent increase. The Officer comes to this conclusion after considering all the factors together. The Landlord has established that its operating costs have changed over the past three years (disclosed in the Statement). Specifically, the Officer references an increase in mortgage interest, property tax, and insurance expenses, which will also increase in 2024. Further, with an additional increase, the Landlord would see a
2.1% return on investment, below what is considered a reasonable return for rental property. The factors weigh in favour of the Landlord’s additional rent increase. Therefore, the Applications are allowed.
[18] The Landlord is permitted to increase the rents by the annual allowable set by the Director in the amount of 3% and the Landlord is permitted to increase the rent by an additional 3% on the effective dates set below. A total rent increase of 6% is allowed.
Conclusion
[19] The Applications are allowed.
[20] TAKE NOTE: This decision contains sensitive information of the Landlord and that the parties are required to preserve its confidentiality pursuant to subsection 75(3) of the Act.

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT
A. The maximum allowable rent for the Residential Property is as follows:
Unit Rent Effective Date 55 $1,322.00 February 1, 2024 57 $1,322.00 February 1, 2024 59 $1,322.00 February 1, 2024 61 $1,322.00 February 1, 2024 63 $1,322.00 February 1, 2024 65 $1,322.00 February 1, 2024 67 $1,322.00 February 1, 2024 69 $1,472.00 February 1, 2024 71 $1,322.00 February 1, 2024
DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, this 24th day of January, 2024.
(sgd.) Mitchell King Mitchell King Residential Tenancy Officer

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

APPENDIX “A” Revised Statement of Income & Expenses (Form 10) Year 1 Proposal Allowed Income Rental Income at 100% (Line 1) $136,380.00 $144,563.00 $144,563.00 Vacancy Arrears/Losses (Line 2) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Net Income before expenses (Line 3) $136,380.00 $144,563.00 $144,563.00 Expenses 1st Mortgage Interest (Line 4) $46,766.00 $46,766.00 $46,766.00 2nd Mortgage Interest (Line 5) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fuel (Line 6) $19,918.00 $19,918.00 $19,918.00 Water & Sewer (Line 7) $6,031.00 $6,031.00 $6,031.00 Electricity (Line 8) $1,231.00 $1,231.00 $1,231.00 Insurance (Line 9) $4,964.00 $4,964.00 $4,964.00 Property Tax (Provincial) (Line 10) $7,869.00 $7,869.00 $7,869.00 Property Tax (Municipal) (Line 11) $4,404.00 $4,404.00 $4,404.00 Management Fee (Line 12) $6,819.00 $6,819.00 $6,819.00 Maintenance Fee (Line 13) $14,302.00 $14,302.00 $14,302.00 Capital Expenditures (Line 14) $4,159.00 $4,159.00 $4,159.00 Other (Line 15) $2,539.00 $2,539.00 $2,539.00 Total Operating Expenses (Line 16) $119,002.00 $119,002.00 $119,002.00 Net Profit or (Loss) (Line 17) $17,378.00 $25,561.00 $25,561.00 Value of Investment in Property $1,210,553.00 $1,210,553.00 $1,210,553.00 Operating Income (Line 17) $17,378.00 $25,561.00 $25,561.00 Return on Investment (ROI) 1.4% 2.1% 2.1%

Orders of the Director of Residential Tenancy

NOTICE
Right to Appeal
This Order can be appealed to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (the “Commission”) by serving a Notice of Appeal with the Commission and every party to this Order within 20 days of this Order.
If a document is sent electronically after 5:00 p.m., it is considered received the next day that is not a holiday. If a document is sent by mail, it is considered served on the third day after mailing.
Filing with the Court
If no appeal has been made within the noted timelines, this Order can be filed with the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island and enforced as if it were an order of the Court.

Similar cases

Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.

  • LR26-38dismissed · irac

    Landlord appeal · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: dismissed. The Landlord's appeal is allowed in part. The Commission substitutes a finding that the Occupation Notice is valid. The rem…

  • LD26-276partial · rto

    Tenant application · rent increase, compensation, repairs. Outcome: partial. 1. The Landlords must pay the Tenants $401.99 by September 5, 2026. 2. The Former Landlord 2 must pay the Tenants $90.00 by…

  • LD26-267granted · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. The Application is allowed.

  • LD26-258granted · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. I find that Applications are allowed.

  • LD26-244granted · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. I find that the Units’ rents will increase by 5.0% effective June 1, 2026. The rents will increase by the 2027 annual allowable percentage plus …

  • LD26-233granted · rto

    Application · eviction, rent increase, compensation. Outcome: granted.

  • LD26-211unknown · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: outcome pending review. I find that the Units’ rents will increase by 5.0% effective July 1, 2026, except for units 10, 14 and 15 (the “Three Units”), wh…

  • LD26-203granted · rto

    Landlord application · rent increase. Outcome: granted. The Landlord’s evidence supports a 5.0% rent increase for the Unit effective June 1, 2026.