Quick summary
Auto-indexedAppeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Commission dismisses the appeal and confirms Director’s Order LD22-050, subject to a variation requiring the outstanding amount of $3,999.36 to be paid forthwith. The Issue The issue to be addressed in this appeal is the amount of return of rent.
Linked prior order: LD22-050
Order text
Docket LR22013 – Michel Al-Mayaleh v. Paula Flanagan and Craig Hughes Wednesday, March 23, 2022 Docket: LR22013 Order: LR22-12 BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Wednesday, March 23, 2022 Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair Hearing Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 ORDER IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Michel Al-Mayaleh against Order LD22-050 issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property and dated February 28, 2022. Compared and Certified a True Copy (Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-12 – Page 2 Docket LR22013 – Michel Al-Mayaleh v. Paula Flanagan and Craig Hughes Wednesday, March 23, 2022 This appeal asks the Commission to determine whether the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) properly determined the amount of a return of rent to a tenant. Background The Appellant, Michel Al-Mayaleh (“Mr. Al-Mayaleh”), entered into a written month-tomonth rental agreement with the Respondents, Paula Flanagan (“Ms. Flanagan”) and Craig Hughes (“Mr. Hughes”), for the premises located at 1 – 19 Hillsborough Street, Charlottetown, PE (the “Premises”) on July 1, 2015. Rent in the amount of $1,086.76 is due on the first day of the month. On January 4, 2022, Ms. Flanagan and Mr. Hughes filed an Application for Enforcement of Statutory or Other Conditions of Rental Agreement (the “Form 2”) against Mr. AlMayaleh seeking a finding that rent is owed and an order than an amount found to be owed be paid. The Form 2 application was heard by the Director on February 24, 2022, and the matter was decided in Order LD22-050 dated February 28, 2022. The Director found that the rent for the Premises had been increased over the course of the tenancy without authorization from the Commission as is required in subsection 23(3) of the Act, and awarded Ms. Flanagan and Mr. Hughes $3,999.36, payable by Mr. AlMayaleh for unauthorized rent increases. In the same order, the Director ordered that the monthly rent for the Premises is $965.00 and that it would remain so until rent was increased in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The Appellant appealed. The matter was heard by the Commission on March 22, 2022. Mr. Al-Mayaleh, Rachel Al-Mayaleh, and Ms. Flanagan all participated by way of telephone conference call. Disposition The Commission dismisses the appeal and confirms Director’s Order LD22-050, subject to a variation requiring the outstanding amount of $3,999.36 to be paid forthwith. The Issue The issue to be addressed in this appeal is the amount of return of rent. Analysis Mr. Al-Mayaleh told the Commission that he acknowledges he made an error and that he owes the Respondents some return of rent money. However, his position is that the Director miscalculated the amount and that the outstanding amount should be less. Ms. Flanagan agrees with the amount calculated by the Director. Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-12 – Page 3 Docket LR22013 – Michel Al-Mayaleh v. Paula Flanagan and Craig Hughes Wednesday, March 23, 2022 The Commission agrees with the calculation of return of rent made by the Director. Mr. Al-Mayaleh was in error in increasing the rent in October 2018 and the Commission agrees with the Director that any increase in subsequent years was unlawful as it was based on the original unlawful increase in rent. The Commission confirms Director’s Order LD22-050, subject to a variance requiring the sum of $3,999.36 to be paid to the Respondents forthwith, that is to say immediately upon receipt of the Commission’s Order. NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act; IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. Director’s Order LD22-050 is confirmed, subject to a variance that the sum of $3,999.36 be paid by Mr. Al-Mayaleh to Paula Flanagan and Craig Hughes forthwith upon receipt of this Order. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Wednesday, March 23, 2022. BY THE COMMISSION: (sgd. Erin T. Mitchell) Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner (sgd. M. Douglas Clow) M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair NOTICE Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows: 26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.
Similar cases
Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.
- LD26-296granted · rto
Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $1,437.88 by the timeline below.
- LD26-294granted · rto
Application · other. Outcome: granted. I find that the Parking Spot is already an included service or facility in the Tenant’s rent. The Landlords must not charge the Tenant a separate fee regarding t…
- LR26-37granted · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: granted. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office decision LD26-125 is confirmed. The Landlords and Bhaskar are liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent and double…
- LR26-36dismissed · irac
Appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is dismissed. The Commission agrees with the finding of Order LD26-130 that the parties did not have a landlord-tenant relationship, or a tenancy agreeme…
- LR26-35dismissed · irac
Tenant appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is denied and the Rental Office’s Order LD26-161 is upheld. The Tenant shall return the Subtenant’s security deposit in the amount of $500.00, plu…
- LD26-238granted · rto
Tenant application · other. Outcome: granted. The Landlord must pay the Tenant $2,256.15. This amount includes the original security deposit ($1,100.00), the $56.15 in accrued interest on the original…
- LR26-34dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-118 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenants a return of rent toge…
- LR26-33dismissed · irac
Landlord appeal · other. Outcome: dismissed. The Appeal is dismissed. Order LD26-131 is confirmed. The Landlord and Bhaskar remain jointly and severally liable to pay the Tenant a return of rent toget…