Quick summary
Auto-indexedAppeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. 1. The appeal is dismissed as Ms. Cochrane failed to participate and thus the appeal was deemed abandoned. 2. Directors’ Orders LD22-167 and LD22-168, both dated May 27, 2022, are confirmed and thus remain in full force and effect.
Linked prior order: LD22-167
Order text
Docket LR22043 – Kerri Cochrane v. Veronika and Valeriy Silinsh Tuesday, July 5, 2022 Docket: LR22043 Order: LR22-35 BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON Tuesday, July 5, 2022. Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair Hearing Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 ORDER IN THE MATTER of an appeal, under section 25 of the Rental of Residential Property Act (the “Act”), filed by Kerri Cochrane against Orders LD22-167 and LD22-168, issued by the Director of Residential Rental Property and both dated May 27, 2022. Compared and Certified a True Copy (Sgd.) Susan Jefferson Commission Administrator Corporate Services and Appeals Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-35 – Page 2 Docket LR22043 – Kerri Cochrane v. Veronika and Valeriy Silinsh Tuesday, July 5, 2022 This appeal asks the question of whether the Director of Residential Rental Property (the “Director”) erred in terminating a rental agreement due to the persistent and habitual late payment of rent by a tenant and finding that rent is due and owing to a landlord. BACKGROUND Kerri Cochrane (“Ms. Cochrane”) rents a single-family dwelling located at 20 Livingstone Drive, Charlottetown, PE (the “Premises”), from Veronika and Valeriy Silinsh (the “Landlords”). Rent for the Premises is $2,000 per month with rent due on the first day of the month. On May 2, 2022, the Landlords filed with the Director two applications. The first application requested an Order terminating the rental agreement because Ms. Cochrane is persistently and habitually late paying rent (the “First Application”). Included in the First Application were a series of Notices of Termination (“Form 4s”) directed to Ms. Cochrane and signed by the Landlords. The second application requested an order that rent is owed and that an amount found to be owed by paid (the “Second Application”). Ms. Cochrane challenged the First and Second Applications. In Order LD22-167 dated May 27, 2022, the Director ordered that Ms. Cochrane, and all occupants, must vacate the Premises by 12:00 noon, June 1, 2022. In Order LD22-168, also dated May 27, 2022, the Director ordered that Ms. Cochrane pay the Landlords the sum of $2,400 on or before June 1, 2022. Ms. Cochrane appealed. The appeal was heard on July 5, 2022. The Landlords and Olesandr Rekhnyuk appeared by way of telephone conference call. Ms. Cochrane did not appear on the telephone conference call. Disposition The appeal is dismissed. Ms. Cochrane did not appear at the hearing and thus the appeal is deemed abandoned. The Commission is satisfied that Ms. Cochrane was advised of the date, time and process of the telephone conference call hearing by way of a Notice of Appeal Hearing, issued on June 23, 2022, and hand delivered on the same date. Ms. Cochrane visited the Commission offices on July 4, 2022, at which time she was reminded of the hearing date and time of 10:00 a.m. on July 5, 2022. As Ms. Cochrane did not participate in the conference call, the Commission, deemed her appeal to be abandoned. NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Act and the Rental of Residential Property Act; Orders of The Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission Order LR22-35 – Page 3 Docket LR22043 – Kerri Cochrane v. Veronika and Valeriy Silinsh Tuesday, July 5, 2022 IT IS ORDERED THAT 1. The appeal is dismissed as Ms. Cochrane failed to participate and thus the appeal was deemed abandoned. 2. Directors’ Orders LD22-167 and LD22-168, both dated May 27, 2022, are confirmed and thus remain in full force and effect. DATED at Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Tuesday, July 5, 2022. BY THE COMMISSION: (sgd. Erin T. Mitchell) Panel Chair - Erin T. Mitchell, Commissioner (sgd. M. Douglas Clow) M. Douglas Clow, Vice-Chair NOTICE Subsections 26(2), 26(3), 26(4) and 26(5) of the Rental of Residential Property Act provides as follows: 26. (2) A lessor or lessee may, within fifteen days of the decision of the Commission, appeal to the court on a question of law only. (3) The rules of court governing appeals apply to an appeal under subsection (2). (4) Where the Commission has confirmed, reversed, or varied an order of the Director and no appeal has been taken within the time specified in subsection (2), the lessor or lessee may file the order in the court. (5) Where an order is filed pursuant to subsection (4), it may be enforced as if it were an order of the court.
Similar cases
Orders that share issues or RTA sections. Useful when comparing how similar facts were decided.
- LD26-286granted · rto
Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the Landlords may dispose of the Personal Property listen on the Inventory on or after August 14, 2026.
- LD26-271granted · rto
Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the Landlord may dispose of the Personal Property on or after July 31, 2026.
- LD26-264denied · rto
Application · compensation, abandonment. Outcome: denied. 1. The Application is denied.
- LD26-242granted · rto
Landlord application · abandonment. Outcome: granted. The Landlord may dispose of the Personal Property in the Inventory List on the terms provided below.
- LD26-215granted · rto
Application · security deposit, abandonment. Outcome: granted. I find that the tenancy will continue and the Tenant can continue living in the Unit. [4] The Landlord is prohibited from removing person…
- LR26-30dismissed · irac
Tenant appeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is deemed abandoned in accordance with Rule 29(1)(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.
- LR26-28dismissed · irac
Tenant appeal · security deposit, rent arrears, abandonment. Outcome: dismissed.
- LR26-25dismissed · irac
Tenant appeal · abandonment. Outcome: dismissed. The appeal is deemed abandoned in accordance with Rule 29(1)(d) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure.